So off we go but if anyone wants the attachments mentioned let me know and I will get them to you. So
how did the get to know you meeting in South Bend go? Rather well I think as it
had a good turnout. Agency staff did a very good job and frankly it was a straight
ahead event. The Region 6 Director and Director Unsworth spoke and then it was comment
and meet the agency time. From my spot on the limb he is different from previous
Directors. By that I mean he is making a real effort to look forward to the
future but to do it with us right with him. Now guys say what you will that is
way way different from the we agency / you public of the past. So if anyone has
a chance to speak with Mr. Unsworth do so. I do believe he actually listens which
again is a huge departure from the past.
on to the 2016 seasons. Nope on the preseason forecast but attached is
preseason ocean abundance forecast ( before harvest ) for the Columbia Coho. It
is the early run that you look to for a quick look for comparisons. Last year
it was forecast for 550k and in the end came in at around 150k. Now this year it
starts at 153k in the ocean before harvest and folks that is so ugly it gives
ugly a bad name. I would like to think that our Coho would perform better but
my gut says I am dreaming.
Chinook are different. Coho only do 1 1/2 years in the salt so any down turn is
really fast as is recovery. Chinook age groups in any year have 3, 4, 5, and 6
year olds. ( twos are jacks ) The dominate years are the 4 & 5 year fish
with the 4 year fish the largest percentage and 3 years the smallest. ( well 6
year is smaller but we have very few anymore ) So for Coho this is the second
year returns are in the dumpster due to poor ocean conditions but for Chinook
we are only at the 3 year point so it should not show the same. While that is
good it is kinda like standing on the railroad tracks watching a locomotive
come at you and not being able to move.
when we do get the preseason forecast we should be OK for Chinook in GH and
Willapa for this year and less so next depending on just how bad the poor ocean
conditions are. Now the bad. ( hate that don't ya ) Unlike Coho that can
rebound quickly ( the lowest Coho escapement I found was in 1994 at around 8k )
Chinook do not. To get a good solid run you need 3,4,5 year fish and that is
the rub it takes FIVE years, if you're lucky. With the massive Alaska and BC intercept
fisheries our rule was blow escapement two generations with careful management
to get out of the toilet. 10 years guys and unless something is done to reduce
ocean intercept 2018 will be the start of that decade it will take to recover.
I realize this sounds like crystal ball time but I have seen this before and
after I am gone you young guys will see it again. In fact broodstocking we had
one year of the five that was a bit short. Why? No idea but it got blasted with
harvest was my thought and just never rebounded due to ongoing ocean harvest
rates applied across the full run.
this is where I make my pitch to the Rec fisher that usually if not always gets
me in trouble. The numbers of Rec
fishers continues to grow, ( Puget Sound is headed our way ) the number of fish
available is in the process of shrinking rapidly, and there ain't no way no how that we can all fish the same
ways in the same places we always have. We need to look to finding ways to
structure our fisheries that meets not just the conservation needs but also
recognizes the ever increasing fishers from outside the area.
to say but hard to do. Why? Because Rec fishers are FIRM believers in circular firing
squads! Setting in a NOF meeting a couple years back a couple of Recs were arguing
a point and a gillnetter setting across from looked up and quietly said "
you gotta tell those guys to quit bring a knife to a gun fight " That is
us guys the Rec fisher! The most quarrelsome, argumentative, stubborn bunch you
will ever meet. We are also the most passionate defender of the fish, foot the
bill to manage harvest and work the hardest to protect and restore habitat. So
in rather short order we will again ( at least in the short term ) be faced
with adapting or face rapid loss of opportunity. I favor adapting, quickly.
up two bills in the legislature are attached for those who do not follow that
sort of thing. No idea if they make the cut but some of you might find them
but not least we have this from Region 6.
The Department will be presenting a
review of the Willapa Bay Basin Salmon Management Policy with regard to the
2015 fall salmon season to the Fish and Wildlife Commission on February 27,
2016 in Olympia.
We are interested in finding out
from all of you what you think the Commission should hear. There is time set
aside for the public to provide direct comment at the meeting, so you will be
able to elaborate if we miss something or don’t cover something in the detail
If you have substantive comments
you think should be included, please reply back to Chad Herring and myself by
February 15, 2016.
Mcclellan, Barbara A (DFW)
should you send comments in? Is this a thinly veiled attempt to get your
comments to ... ah ... sanitize them to the Commission? Is this a end run to
try to get the Commercials thought up front? Is this ( insert question of
choice )? I do not know and everyone should use their own judgment as this is a
citizen participation thing.
said in my mind any comments to the contact identified should have a CC copy to
the Commission & Director. That will pretty much take of sanitation of your
thoughts. After that guys this is a personal decision for all to make.
Posted on Fri, February 5, 2016
by Dave Hamilton